This is not a Natural Hazard Disclosure statement. Open state data, explained; flood and dam zones are not covered. Details
Is Whitehawk in a fire hazard severity zone?
88.2% of Whitehawk is mapped in a fire hazard severity zone, and 84.4% in High or Very High, where the seller disclosures apply.
Whitehawk ranks 303 of 1050 California places for the share of land in High or Very High zones.
In land area, that is 1.61 sq mi Very High, 0.57 sq mi High, 0.10 sq mi Moderate, out of 2.58 sq mi. Its High and Very High share of 84.4% is 59.7 points above the 24.7% of Plumas County. Among 46 places in the county it ranks 11 for exposure; East Shore ranks first at 100.0%. The state has not evaluated Whitehawk for liquefaction or landslides, so the absence of a seismic hazard zone proves nothing.
Zones differ from street to street: check the address above. In Plumas County overall, 21.5% of the land is Very High.
No fire perimeter since 1950 touches Whitehawk in the state record. Small fires are often missing from it.
Nearby places compared
- Valley Ranch, 1.7 mi northwest: 89.9% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Clio, 2.2 mi north: 69.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Gold Mountain, 3.3 mi northeast: 72.1% High or Very High, 3 fires
- C-Road, 3.4 mi northwest: 89.2% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Mabie, 3.9 mi north: 52.6% High or Very High, 3 fires
- Blairsden, 4.9 mi northwest: 99.8% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Graeagle, 5.7 mi northwest: 54.5% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $422,400
- Iron Horse, 5.7 mi northeast: 32.4% High or Very High, 3 fires, median home $195,500
- Mohawk Vista, 6.4 mi north: 20.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Delleker, 6.8 mi northeast: 79.1% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $317,800
- Calpine, 7.1 mi southeast: 93.8% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Portola, 7.9 mi northeast: 99.8% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $232,100