This is not a Natural Hazard Disclosure statement. Open state data, explained; flood and dam zones are not covered. Details
Is Clio in a fire hazard severity zone?
69.1% of Clio is mapped in a fire hazard severity zone, and 69.1% in High or Very High, where the seller disclosures apply.
Clio ranks 422 of 1050 California places for the share of land in High or Very High zones.
In land area, that is 0.40 sq mi Very High, out of 0.58 sq mi. Its High and Very High share of 69.1% is 44.4 points above the 24.7% of Plumas County. Among 46 places in the county it ranks 18 for exposure; East Shore ranks first at 100.0%. The latest recorded fire is (unnamed) in 1959. By decade: 1950s: 1. The state has not evaluated Clio for liquefaction or landslides, so the absence of a seismic hazard zone proves nothing.
Zones differ from street to street: check the address above. In Plumas County overall, 21.5% of the land is Very High.
Fires recorded in or across Clio
The state record shows 1 since 1950. The largest was (unnamed) in 1959 (1,680 acres in total).
- (unnamed) (1959), 1,680 acres
Nearby places compared
- Valley Ranch, 0.5 mi south: 89.9% High or Very High, 0 fires
- C-Road, 1.3 mi northwest: 89.2% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Whitehawk, 2.2 mi south: 84.4% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Mabie, 2.2 mi northeast: 52.6% High or Very High, 3 fires
- Gold Mountain, 2.7 mi east: 72.1% High or Very High, 3 fires
- Blairsden, 2.9 mi northwest: 99.8% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Mohawk Vista, 4.3 mi north: 20.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Graeagle, 4.4 mi west: 54.5% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $422,400
- Iron Horse, 5.2 mi northeast: 32.4% High or Very High, 3 fires, median home $195,500
- Delleker, 5.5 mi northeast: 79.1% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $317,800
- Plumas Eureka, 6.5 mi northwest: 23.4% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $503,200
- Portola, 6.8 mi northeast: 99.8% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $232,100