This is not a Natural Hazard Disclosure statement. Open state data, explained; flood and dam zones are not covered. Details
Is Mabie in a fire hazard severity zone?
52.6% of Mabie is mapped in a fire hazard severity zone, and 52.6% in High or Very High, where the seller disclosures apply.
Mabie ranks 546 of 1050 California places for the share of land in High or Very High zones.
In land area, that is 1.90 sq mi Very High, out of 3.61 sq mi. Its High and Very High share of 52.6% is 27.9 points above the 24.7% of Plumas County. Among 46 places in the county it ranks 28 for exposure; East Shore ranks first at 100.0%. The latest recorded fire is (unnamed) in 1987. By decade: 1950s: 1, 1960s: 1, 1980s: 1. The state has not evaluated Mabie for liquefaction or landslides, so the absence of a seismic hazard zone proves nothing.
Zones differ from street to street: check the address above. In Plumas County overall, 21.5% of the land is Very High.
Fires recorded in or across Mabie
The state record shows 3 since 1950. The largest was (unnamed) in 1964 (2,351 acres in total).
- (unnamed) (1987), 409 acres
- (unnamed) (1964), 2,351 acres
- (unnamed) (1959), 1,680 acres
Nearby places compared
- Gold Mountain, 1.9 mi southeast: 72.1% High or Very High, 3 fires
- C-Road, 2.0 mi southwest: 89.2% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Clio, 2.2 mi southwest: 69.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Valley Ranch, 2.7 mi southwest: 89.9% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Mohawk Vista, 3.3 mi northwest: 20.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Blairsden, 3.4 mi west: 99.8% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Delleker, 3.4 mi northeast: 79.1% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $317,800
- Iron Horse, 3.7 mi east: 32.4% High or Very High, 3 fires, median home $195,500
- Whitehawk, 3.9 mi south: 84.4% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Portola, 4.7 mi northeast: 99.8% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $232,100
- Graeagle, 5.7 mi west: 54.5% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $422,400
- Lake Davis, 6.7 mi northeast: 98.6% High or Very High, 2 fires