This is not a Natural Hazard Disclosure statement. Open state data, explained; flood and dam zones are not covered. Details
Is Graeagle in a fire hazard severity zone?
55.2% of Graeagle is mapped in a fire hazard severity zone, and 54.5% in High or Very High, where the seller disclosures apply.
Graeagle ranks 536 of 1050 California places for the share of land in High or Very High zones.
In land area, that is 3.14 sq mi Very High, 2.92 sq mi High, 0.08 sq mi Moderate, out of 11.12 sq mi. Its High and Very High share of 54.5% is 29.8 points above the 24.7% of Plumas County. The median home value of $422,400 is 29% above the county median of $327,400. Among 46 places in the county it ranks 27 for exposure; East Shore ranks first at 100.0%. The state has not evaluated Graeagle for liquefaction or landslides, so the absence of a seismic hazard zone proves nothing.
Zones differ from street to street: check the address above. In Plumas County overall, 21.5% of the land is Very High.
No fire perimeter since 1950 touches Graeagle in the state record. Small fires are often missing from it.
Nearby places compared
- Blairsden, 2.5 mi northeast: 99.8% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Johnsville, 3.3 mi west: 60.7% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Plumas Eureka, 3.3 mi north: 23.4% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $503,200
- C-Road, 3.8 mi east: 89.2% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Valley Ranch, 4.4 mi east: 89.9% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Clio, 4.4 mi east: 69.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Mohawk Vista, 4.8 mi northeast: 20.1% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Whitehawk, 5.7 mi southeast: 84.4% High or Very High, 0 fires
- Mabie, 5.7 mi east: 52.6% High or Very High, 3 fires
- Gold Mountain, 7.0 mi east: 72.1% High or Very High, 3 fires
- Cromberg, 8.5 mi north: 62.4% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $376,600
- Delleker, 9.0 mi northeast: 79.1% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $317,800