This is not a Natural Hazard Disclosure statement. Open state data, explained; flood and dam zones are not covered. Details
Is Rolling Hills in a fire hazard severity zone?
3.3% of Rolling Hills is mapped in a fire hazard severity zone, and 0.0% in High or Very High, where the seller disclosures apply.
In land area, that is 0.02 sq mi Moderate, out of 0.60 sq mi. Its High and Very High share of 0.0% is 24.9 points below the 24.9% of Madera County. The median home value of $602,700 is 64% above the county median of $367,700. Among 17 places in the county it ranks 17 for exposure; Nipinnawasee ranks first at 100.0%. The state has not evaluated Rolling Hills for liquefaction or landslides, so the absence of a seismic hazard zone proves nothing.
Zones differ from street to street: check the address above. In Madera County overall, 9.0% of the land is Very High.
No fire perimeter since 1950 touches Rolling Hills in the state record. Small fires are often missing from it.
Nearby places compared
- Fort Washington, 2.4 mi southeast: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $1,039,600
- Madera Ranchos, 4.7 mi west: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $448,000
- Bonadelle Ranchos, 6.8 mi northwest: 1.8% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $460,900
- Old Fig Garden, 7.1 mi south: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $460,800
- Clovis, 7.5 mi southeast: 0.6% High or Very High, 5 fires, median home $453,300
- Friant, 7.6 mi northeast: 0.0% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $260,200
- Fresno, 7.8 mi south: 0.0% High or Very High, 1 fire, median home $348,500
- Millerton, 8.9 mi northeast: 11.8% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $582,500
- Tarpey Village, 9.0 mi southeast: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $336,300
- Mayfair, 9.1 mi south: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $244,200
- Parksdale, 13.0 mi west: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $259,600
- Calwa, 13.0 mi south: 0.0% High or Very High, 0 fires, median home $196,900