This is not a Natural Hazard Disclosure statement. Open state data, explained; flood and dam zones are not covered. Details
Is Paxton in a fire hazard severity zone?
26.5% of Paxton is mapped in a fire hazard severity zone, and 26.5% in High or Very High, where the seller disclosures apply.
Paxton ranks 754 of 1050 California places for the share of land in High or Very High zones.
In land area, that is 0.09 sq mi Very High, out of 0.33 sq mi. Its High and Very High share of 26.5% is 1.8 points above the 24.7% of Plumas County. Among 46 places in the county it ranks 36 for exposure; East Shore ranks first at 100.0%. The latest recorded fire is DIXIE in 2021. By decade: 2020s: 1. The state has not evaluated Paxton for liquefaction or landslides, so the absence of a seismic hazard zone proves nothing.
Zones differ from street to street: check the address above. In Plumas County overall, 21.5% of the land is Very High.
Fires recorded in or across Paxton
The state record shows 1 since 1950. The largest was DIXIE in 2021 (963,405 acres in total).
- DIXIE (2021), 963,405 acres
Nearby places compared
- Twain, 1.1 mi northwest: 43.0% High or Very High, 4 fires
- Indian Falls, 2.8 mi northeast: 18.6% High or Very High, 2 fires
- Keddie, 3.9 mi southeast: 37.2% High or Very High, 1 fire
- Crescent Mills, 7.2 mi northeast: 74.7% High or Very High, 2 fires
- Quincy, 7.6 mi southeast: 68.6% High or Very High, 1 fire, median home $284,500
- Meadow Valley, 8.0 mi southwest: 34.1% High or Very High, 2 fires, median home $280,200
- Greenville, 8.1 mi northeast: 68.8% High or Very High, 1 fire, median home $353,900
- Caribou, 8.4 mi northwest: 4.2% High or Very High, 2 fires
- East Quincy, 9.3 mi southeast: 39.9% High or Very High, 4 fires, median home $303,200
- Taylorsville, 9.5 mi east: 26.7% High or Very High, 2 fires
- Canyondam, 10.1 mi north: 65.7% High or Very High, 2 fires
- Bucks Lake, 12.5 mi southwest: 15.3% High or Very High, 4 fires